Playlist Analysis
Curator authenticity, engagement metrics, and fraud scoring
Feature in Development
Playlist intelligence features are currently in development. Expected availability: Phase 3 of beta testing (November 2025).
50+ Engagement Metrics
v9.3 analyzes playlists across 7 dimensions with over 50 individual metrics to provide comprehensive fraud assessment.
Curator Profile
Follower count, account age, verification status, profile completeness
Playlist Characteristics
Track count, duration, update frequency, description quality
Engagement Patterns
Follower growth, likes, shares, saves, skip rates
Temporal Analysis
Stream velocity, time-of-day patterns, weekly cycles
Geographic Distribution
Listener locations, concentration metrics, anomalies
Content Quality
Genre consistency, artist diversity, track quality scores
Network Relationships
Connections to other playlists, cross-promotion patterns
5-Tier Curator Classification
Tier 1: Official Spotify Playlists
Fraud Rate: <0.5%
- Examples: Today's Top Hits, RapCaviar, New Music Friday
- Characteristics: Verified account, millions of followers, editorial team
- Trust Level: Highest - Safe for all commercial purposes
- Identification: Spotify-branded account, verified badge
Tier 2: Verified Independent Curators
Fraud Rate: <2%
- Examples: Established music blogs, major influencers, record labels
- Characteristics: Verified badge, >100K followers, consistent quality
- Trust Level: High - Reliable for playlist placement
- Vetting: Manual verification by Spotify
Tier 3: Established Independent Curators
Fraud Rate: 5-10%
- Characteristics: 10K-100K followers, active >1 year, good engagement
- Trust Level: Moderate - Generally safe, occasional issues
- Monitoring: Regular engagement quality checks recommended
- Examples: Niche genre curators, regional tastemakers
Tier 4: Emerging Curators
Fraud Rate: 15-25%
- Characteristics: <10K followers, newer accounts, inconsistent engagement
- Trust Level: Low - High fraud risk, careful monitoring required
- Red Flags: Rapid follower growth, suspicious engagement patterns
- Examples: New playlist services, unverified promoters
Tier 5: Suspicious Accounts
Fraud Rate: >40%
- Characteristics: Bot-like behavior, irregular patterns, fake engagement
- Trust Level: None - Avoid completely
- Warning Signs: Benford's Law violations, 24/7 streaming, click farm locations
- Action: Report to Spotify, remove tracks immediately
Engagement Quality Analysis
Skip Rate Analysis
- Human Listeners: 15-25% skip rate (natural behavior)
- Bot Listeners: <5% skip rate (programmed to complete tracks)
- Fraud Indicator: Skip rate <8% is highly suspicious
- Context: Genre-dependent (EDM has lower skip rates naturally)
Completion Rate Analysis
- Human Listeners: 60-80% completion (varies by track quality)
- Bot Listeners: >95% completion (too consistent)
- Fraud Indicator: >90% completion across all tracks
- Analysis: Compare playlist-wide vs individual track completion
Listener Diversity
- Unique Listeners Per Stream: Natural playlists have diverse listeners
- Bot Farms: Same accounts streaming repeatedly
- Fraud Indicator: <20% unique listeners per 100 streams
- Network Analysis: Identify account clusters
Time-of-Day Patterns
- Human Patterns: Peak during commute hours, evenings, weekends
- Bot Patterns: Consistent 24/7 streaming without variation
- Fraud Indicator: Flat time-of-day distribution
- Geographic Correlation: Activity should match listener time zones
Playlist Health Indicators
Organic Growth
Gradual, steady follower increases over months
Consistent Updates
Regular refreshes (weekly or bi-weekly typical)
Engaged Followers
Likes, saves, and shares proportional to follower count
Genre Consistency
Coherent musical theme, not random tracks
Artist Diversity
Mix of established and emerging artists
Natural Engagement
Skip rates, completion rates within expected ranges
Combined Track + Playlist Analysis
When both AI detection and playlist intelligence are complete, you'll be able to analyze tracks in context of their playlist placements.
Scenario 1: AI Track on Fraudulent Playlist
- Track AI Detection: Suno 80% confidence
- Playlist Fraud Score: 85 (Critical)
- Combined Risk: Extremely High
- Interpretation: AI-generated track promoted through bot network
- Recommendation: Report to platform, avoid engagement
Scenario 2: Human Track on Organic Playlist
- Track AI Detection: Human 90% confidence
- Playlist Fraud Score: 12 (Clean)
- Combined Risk: Very Low
- Interpretation: Legitimate artist on authentic playlist
- Recommendation: Safe for all commercial purposes
Scenario 3: AI Track on Tier 1 Playlist
- Track AI Detection: AIVA 75% confidence
- Playlist Fraud Score: 2 (Clean - Official Spotify)
- Combined Risk: Low
- Interpretation: Licensed AI music on legitimate platform
- Recommendation: Verify AIVA licensing terms
Playlist Analysis Workflow
Step 1: Playlist Identification
- Enter Spotify playlist URL
- System fetches playlist metadata
- Curator profile analyzed
- Historical data retrieved (if available)
Step 2: Data Collection
- 50+ metrics extracted via Spotify API
- Engagement patterns analyzed
- Network relationships mapped
- Historical trends calculated
Step 3: Statistical Analysis
- Benford's Law test on follower/stream counts
- Time-series decomposition
- K-means clustering for pattern recognition
- Anomaly detection with Isolation Forest
Step 4: ML Model Inference
- XGBoost fraud detection model
- Artist authenticity classification
- Curator tier assignment
- Confidence score calculation
Step 5: Report Generation
- Fraud score (0-100) displayed
- Risk breakdown by dimension
- Actionable recommendations
- Export PDF/JSON evidence