Playlist Analysis

Curator authenticity, engagement metrics, and fraud scoring

Feature in Development

Playlist intelligence features are currently in development. Expected availability: Phase 3 of beta testing (November 2025).

50+ Engagement Metrics

v9.3 analyzes playlists across 7 dimensions with over 50 individual metrics to provide comprehensive fraud assessment.

Curator Profile

Follower count, account age, verification status, profile completeness

Playlist Characteristics

Track count, duration, update frequency, description quality

Engagement Patterns

Follower growth, likes, shares, saves, skip rates

Temporal Analysis

Stream velocity, time-of-day patterns, weekly cycles

Geographic Distribution

Listener locations, concentration metrics, anomalies

Content Quality

Genre consistency, artist diversity, track quality scores

Network Relationships

Connections to other playlists, cross-promotion patterns

5-Tier Curator Classification

Tier 1: Official Spotify Playlists

Fraud Rate: <0.5%

  • Examples: Today's Top Hits, RapCaviar, New Music Friday
  • Characteristics: Verified account, millions of followers, editorial team
  • Trust Level: Highest - Safe for all commercial purposes
  • Identification: Spotify-branded account, verified badge

Tier 2: Verified Independent Curators

Fraud Rate: <2%

  • Examples: Established music blogs, major influencers, record labels
  • Characteristics: Verified badge, >100K followers, consistent quality
  • Trust Level: High - Reliable for playlist placement
  • Vetting: Manual verification by Spotify

Tier 3: Established Independent Curators

Fraud Rate: 5-10%

  • Characteristics: 10K-100K followers, active >1 year, good engagement
  • Trust Level: Moderate - Generally safe, occasional issues
  • Monitoring: Regular engagement quality checks recommended
  • Examples: Niche genre curators, regional tastemakers

Tier 4: Emerging Curators

Fraud Rate: 15-25%

  • Characteristics: <10K followers, newer accounts, inconsistent engagement
  • Trust Level: Low - High fraud risk, careful monitoring required
  • Red Flags: Rapid follower growth, suspicious engagement patterns
  • Examples: New playlist services, unverified promoters

Tier 5: Suspicious Accounts

Fraud Rate: >40%

  • Characteristics: Bot-like behavior, irregular patterns, fake engagement
  • Trust Level: None - Avoid completely
  • Warning Signs: Benford's Law violations, 24/7 streaming, click farm locations
  • Action: Report to Spotify, remove tracks immediately

Engagement Quality Analysis

Skip Rate Analysis

  • Human Listeners: 15-25% skip rate (natural behavior)
  • Bot Listeners: <5% skip rate (programmed to complete tracks)
  • Fraud Indicator: Skip rate <8% is highly suspicious
  • Context: Genre-dependent (EDM has lower skip rates naturally)

Completion Rate Analysis

  • Human Listeners: 60-80% completion (varies by track quality)
  • Bot Listeners: >95% completion (too consistent)
  • Fraud Indicator: >90% completion across all tracks
  • Analysis: Compare playlist-wide vs individual track completion

Listener Diversity

  • Unique Listeners Per Stream: Natural playlists have diverse listeners
  • Bot Farms: Same accounts streaming repeatedly
  • Fraud Indicator: <20% unique listeners per 100 streams
  • Network Analysis: Identify account clusters

Time-of-Day Patterns

  • Human Patterns: Peak during commute hours, evenings, weekends
  • Bot Patterns: Consistent 24/7 streaming without variation
  • Fraud Indicator: Flat time-of-day distribution
  • Geographic Correlation: Activity should match listener time zones

Playlist Health Indicators

Organic Growth

Gradual, steady follower increases over months

Consistent Updates

Regular refreshes (weekly or bi-weekly typical)

Engaged Followers

Likes, saves, and shares proportional to follower count

Genre Consistency

Coherent musical theme, not random tracks

Artist Diversity

Mix of established and emerging artists

Natural Engagement

Skip rates, completion rates within expected ranges

Combined Track + Playlist Analysis

When both AI detection and playlist intelligence are complete, you'll be able to analyze tracks in context of their playlist placements.

Scenario 1: AI Track on Fraudulent Playlist

  • Track AI Detection: Suno 80% confidence
  • Playlist Fraud Score: 85 (Critical)
  • Combined Risk: Extremely High
  • Interpretation: AI-generated track promoted through bot network
  • Recommendation: Report to platform, avoid engagement

Scenario 2: Human Track on Organic Playlist

  • Track AI Detection: Human 90% confidence
  • Playlist Fraud Score: 12 (Clean)
  • Combined Risk: Very Low
  • Interpretation: Legitimate artist on authentic playlist
  • Recommendation: Safe for all commercial purposes

Scenario 3: AI Track on Tier 1 Playlist

  • Track AI Detection: AIVA 75% confidence
  • Playlist Fraud Score: 2 (Clean - Official Spotify)
  • Combined Risk: Low
  • Interpretation: Licensed AI music on legitimate platform
  • Recommendation: Verify AIVA licensing terms

Playlist Analysis Workflow

Step 1: Playlist Identification

  1. Enter Spotify playlist URL
  2. System fetches playlist metadata
  3. Curator profile analyzed
  4. Historical data retrieved (if available)

Step 2: Data Collection

  1. 50+ metrics extracted via Spotify API
  2. Engagement patterns analyzed
  3. Network relationships mapped
  4. Historical trends calculated

Step 3: Statistical Analysis

  1. Benford's Law test on follower/stream counts
  2. Time-series decomposition
  3. K-means clustering for pattern recognition
  4. Anomaly detection with Isolation Forest

Step 4: ML Model Inference

  1. XGBoost fraud detection model
  2. Artist authenticity classification
  3. Curator tier assignment
  4. Confidence score calculation

Step 5: Report Generation

  1. Fraud score (0-100) displayed
  2. Risk breakdown by dimension
  3. Actionable recommendations
  4. Export PDF/JSON evidence

Related Topics