AI Music Generation Detection

How v9.3 identifies AI-generated music from 8+ platforms

What is AI Music Detection?

v9.3's AI detection system analyzes tracks to determine whether they were created by AI music generation platforms (Suno, Udio, AIVA, etc.) or human composers and producers.

Detection Capabilities:

  • Identify specific AI generation platform (Suno, Udio, AIVA, etc.)
  • Provide confidence scores (0-100%)
  • Calculate platform-specific risk assessments
  • Detect human-created music with high accuracy
  • Analyze audio features for AI indicators

Supported AI Platforms

v9.3 can detect music from 8 major AI generation platforms, each with distinct characteristics and risk profiles.

Suno - High Risk Platform

Risk Scores:

  • Copyright Risk: 85%
  • Legal Risk: 70%
  • Ownership Risk: 90%
  • Market Risk: 60%

Characteristics: Text-to-music generation, full song creation with vocals, high commercial use

Udio - High Risk Platform

Risk Scores:

  • Copyright Risk: 80%
  • Legal Risk: 65%
  • Ownership Risk: 85%
  • Market Risk: 55%

Characteristics: Advanced vocal synthesis, genre-specific generation, commercial applications

AIVA - Moderate Risk Platform

Risk Scores:

  • Copyright Risk: 40%
  • Legal Risk: 30%
  • Ownership Risk: 45%
  • Market Risk: 35%

Characteristics: Classical and cinematic focus, licensed for commercial use, clear ownership terms

Soundraw

Risk: 35% - Background music generation, royalty-free licensing

Soundful

Risk: 35% - Loop and template-based, clear licensing terms

Mubert

Risk: 45% - Generative ambient music, streaming-focused

Beatoven

Risk: 30% - Video background music, commercial licensing

Endel

Risk: 25% - Adaptive soundscapes, wellness focus, low commercial risk

Human Artists

Risk: 5% - Naturally created music, standard copyright protections

How AI Detection Works

Step 1: Metadata Enrichment

System fetches track information from multiple sources:

  • Spotify: Release date, label, popularity, artist followers
  • YouTube: Video views, likes, comments, engagement metrics
  • Deezer: Track rank, availability, audio preview URL

Importance: Metadata provides context clues about track authenticity

Step 2: Audio Download & Analysis

If audio preview available (Deezer):

  1. Download 30-second preview (15-second timeout)
  2. Extract audio features with librosa library
  3. Analyze spectral, temporal, and timbral characteristics
  4. Compare against AI detection indicators

Note: If no audio available, system continues with metadata-only analysis

Step 3: Multi-AI Platform Analysis

System queries three AI platforms simultaneously:

  • OpenAI GPT-4: Pattern recognition and text analysis
  • Anthropic Claude Opus 4.1: Deep reasoning and context understanding
  • Perplexity Sonar: Web search and metadata validation

Each AI analyzes track information and provides platform likelihood scores

Step 4: Aggregate Platform Detection

System combines results from all three AIs:

  1. Parse structured data from each AI response
  2. Calculate weighted average for each platform
  3. Determine maximum confidence platform
  4. Validate consistency across AI responses

Priority: Structured data > Text parsing for accuracy

Step 5: Confidence-Scaled Risk Assessment

Risk scores calculated using formula:

Risk = Platform Base Risk × (Confidence / 100)

Then adjusted for metadata factors:

  • Major labels: -30 copyright, -25 legal
  • Pre-2020 releases: -50 all risks (pre-AI era)
  • High followers (>100K): -20 ownership, -15 market

AI Detection Audio Indicators

Specific audio characteristics that suggest AI generation:

Low Spectral Variance

AI music has more uniform frequency distribution (<300 variance)

Compressed Dynamics

AI tracks show limited dynamic range (<0.05 range)

Low Spectral Flatness

AI music is more tonal, less noisy (<0.05 flatness)

MFCC Uniformity

AI shows consistent timbral texture (std <10)

Human Music Characteristics:

  • Higher spectral variance (natural performance variations)
  • Greater dynamic range (expressive performance)
  • More spectral flatness (acoustic instruments)
  • Variable MFCCs (natural timbral changes)

Accuracy & Limitations

Current Accuracy (Beta)

  • Human Detection: Target 85-95% (validation in progress)
  • AI Platform ID: 70-85% for Suno/Udio
  • Risk Assessment: 80-90% correlation with expert reviews

Note: Beta testing will refine these accuracy metrics

Known Limitations

  • Not all tracks have audio previews (metadata-only less accurate)
  • Human-AI collaborations may produce ambiguous results
  • Heavily post-processed AI music may appear more human-like
  • New AI platforms not yet in training data may be missed

Real-World Use Cases

Independent Artist Protection

Scenario: Artist suspects their song was copied by AI platform

  1. Verify original track (expect Human 85-95%)
  2. Verify suspected AI copy (expect Suno/Udio 70-85%)
  3. Compare risk scores and audio features
  4. Generate evidence report for legal action

Record Label Due Diligence

Scenario: Label evaluating signing new artist

  1. Verify all tracks in artist's catalog
  2. Check for AI generation patterns
  3. Review risk scores for licensing viability
  4. Make informed signing decision

Playlist Curator Verification

Scenario: Curator maintaining organic playlist

  1. Verify all tracks before adding to playlist
  2. Ensure Human likelihood >80%
  3. Maintain playlist integrity
  4. Avoid AI-generated content

Related Topics